<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Well I made a pigs ear out of that one</title>
	<atom:link href="http://footytrader.com/well-i-made-a-pigs-ear-out-of-that-one/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://footytrader.com/well-i-made-a-pigs-ear-out-of-that-one</link>
	<description>How to trade on football markets on a betting exchange</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:23:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nik simms</title>
		<link>http://footytrader.com/well-i-made-a-pigs-ear-out-of-that-one/comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>nik simms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 08:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footytrader.com/?p=135#comment-43</guid>
		<description>What about BFexplorer. The new kid on the block that could deliver not just ease of use but every piece of information required to effectively trade.

http://www.bfexplorer.com/

Regards
Nik</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about BFexplorer. The new kid on the block that could deliver not just ease of use but every piece of information required to effectively trade.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bfexplorer.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bfexplorer.com/</a></p>
<p>Regards<br />
Nik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://footytrader.com/well-i-made-a-pigs-ear-out-of-that-one/comment-page-1#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footytrader.com/?p=135#comment-42</guid>
		<description>http://www.soccerstats.com/team.asp?league=portugal&amp;teamid=13

Braga at home: cca 72 % overs
- above distribution (even before last match  it couldnt have been less than 70%)

Matches over 2.5 goals	72 %	36 %	54 %
 Matches under 2.5 goals	27 %	63 %	45 %

Naval AWAY :
Matches over 2.5 goals	27 %	45 %	36 %
 Matches under 2.5 goals	72 %	54 %	63 %

unders : 54% which is close to  normal distribution

There was an article in Football outlook stating that
the HOME /AWAY  UNDR/OVR distribution is
significant .


In light of the above, my analysis points for a slight inclination for overs - which it did happen - aka three goals

Maybe a good pointer for next time around...

Keep up the good work..

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.soccerstats.com/team.asp?league=portugal&#038;teamid=13" rel="nofollow">http://www.soccerstats.com/team.asp?league=portugal&#038;teamid=13</a></p>
<p>Braga at home: cca 72 % overs<br />
- above distribution (even before last match  it couldnt have been less than 70%)</p>
<p>Matches over 2.5 goals	72 %	36 %	54 %<br />
 Matches under 2.5 goals	27 %	63 %	45 %</p>
<p>Naval AWAY :<br />
Matches over 2.5 goals	27 %	45 %	36 %<br />
 Matches under 2.5 goals	72 %	54 %	63 %</p>
<p>unders : 54% which is close to  normal distribution</p>
<p>There was an article in Football outlook stating that<br />
the HOME /AWAY  UNDR/OVR distribution is<br />
significant .</p>
<p>In light of the above, my analysis points for a slight inclination for overs &#8211; which it did happen &#8211; aka three goals</p>
<p>Maybe a good pointer for next time around&#8230;</p>
<p>Keep up the good work..</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

